Risk Accounting
Risk Accounting
Section titled “Risk Accounting”Trust Ledger
Section titled “Trust Ledger”Maintain a record of all trust-relevant events:
TrustLedger { entries: [ { timestamp: DateTime, event_type: Enum[Grant, Revoke, Exercise, Verify, Violation], principal: AgentId, subject: AgentId, trust_amount: Delegation Risk, context: TaskId, evidence: [Evidence], outcome: Optional[Outcome] } ]}Event types:
- Grant: Principal grants trust to subject for task
- Revoke: Principal revokes previously granted trust
- Exercise: Subject exercises granted trust (takes action)
- Verify: Verification of subject’s trustworthiness
- Violation: Subject violates trust
Trust Balance Sheet
Section titled “Trust Balance Sheet”Assets (trust granted to us):
Trust_received = Σⱼ Trust(j → us)Liabilities (trust we’ve granted to others):
Trust_granted = Σⱼ Trust(us → j)Net trust position:
Net_trust = Trust_received - Trust_grantedTrust Audit Process
Section titled “Trust Audit Process”flowchart LR
S[1. Scope Definition] --> E[2. Evidence Collection]
E --> C[3. Trust Computation]
C --> Ch[4. Compliance Checking]
Ch --> R[5. Recommendations]
1. Scope Definition
Section titled “1. Scope Definition”- Which components are in scope?
- What time period?
- What trust relationships?
2. Evidence Collection
Section titled “2. Evidence Collection”- Trust contracts
- Trust ledger entries
- Verification records
- Incident reports
3. Trust Computation
Section titled “3. Trust Computation”- Compute Delegation Risk for each component
- Compute risk inheritance through system
- Identify trust concentrations and bottlenecks
4. Compliance Checking
Section titled “4. Compliance Checking”- Are trust levels within stated bounds?
- Were verification requirements met?
- Were incidents properly handled?
5. Recommendations
Section titled “5. Recommendations”- Trust reallocation
- Additional verification
- Architectural changes
Trust KPIs and Dashboards
Section titled “Trust KPIs and Dashboards”Key Performance Indicators:
| KPI | Definition | Target |
|---|---|---|
| System Delegation Risk | Total expected trust exposure | < $X |
| Trust concentration | Herfindahl index of component Delegation Risks | < 0.25 |
| Verification coverage | % of trust relationships verified | > 90% |
| Trust decay rate | Average λ across components | < 0.1/month |
| Incident rate | Trust violations per time period | < 1/quarter |
| Mean time to detect | Average time to detect violation | < 1 hour |
| Mean time to respond | Average time to respond to violation | < 4 hours |
Dashboard elements:
- Trust topology visualization
- Heat map of component Delegation Risks
- Time series of system Delegation Risk
- Alert status for trust violations
- Verification schedule and status
Dashboard Mockup
Section titled “Dashboard Mockup”What a trust monitoring dashboard might look like:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐│ TRUST DASHBOARD Last updated: 2 min ago │├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤│ ││ ┌─────────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────┐ ││ │ SYSTEM Delegation Risk │ │ VERIFICATION │ │ INCIDENTS │ ││ │ │ │ │ │ │ ││ │ $4,230/month │ │ 94.2% │ │ 0 │ ││ │ ██████████░░ 85% │ │ ████████████░░ │ │ this quarter │ ││ │ of $5,000 budget │ │ coverage │ │ ✓ target met │ ││ └─────────────────────┘ └─────────────────────┘ └─────────────────────┘ ││ ││ COMPONENT Delegation Risk BREAKDOWN TRUST TOPOLOGY ││ ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────────┐ ││ │ Coordinator ████████░░ $1,200 │ │ [Human] │ ││ │ Code Generator ██████████ $1,500 │ │ │ 0.95 │ ││ │ Code Reviewer ██████░░░░ $800 │ │ [Coordinator] │ ││ │ Test Runner ███░░░░░░░ $400 │ │ / \ │ ││ │ Deployer █░░░░░░░░░ $180 │ │ 0.8 0.7 │ ││ │ Other ██░░░░░░░░ $150 │ │ [Gen] [Review] │ ││ └─────────────────────────────────────┘ └─────────────────────────┘ ││ ││ ALERTS VERIFICATION STATUS ││ ┌─────────────────────────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────────┐ ││ │ ⚠ Code Generator Delegation Risk +15% (24h) │ │ ✓ Coordinator 3d ago │ ││ │ ℹ Scheduled verify: Reviewer (2h) │ │ ✓ Generator 1d ago │ ││ │ │ │ ⏳ Reviewer due 2h │ ││ │ │ │ ✓ Test Runner 5d ago │ ││ └─────────────────────────────────────┘ └─────────────────────────┘ ││ ││ Delegation Risk TREND (30 days) ││ ┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ ││ │ $5k ┤ budget line │ ││ │ │ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ │ ││ │ $4k ┤ ╭─╮ ╭───╮ │ ││ │ │ ╭───╯ ╰───╯ ╰──────────────────╮ │ ││ │ $3k ┤──╯ ╰──────────── │ ││ │ │ │ ││ │ $2k ┤ │ ││ │ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── │ ││ │ Day 1 Day 10 Day 20 Day 30 │ ││ └─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ ││ │└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘Key dashboard features:
- Top row: Critical KPIs at a glance (Delegation Risk vs budget, verification coverage, incidents)
- Component breakdown: Which components contribute most to system risk
- Trust topology: Visual representation of delegation chains with trust weights
- Alerts: Proactive warnings about budget trends and due verifications
- Trend chart: Historical Delegation Risk to spot drift before it becomes a problem
Trust Forensics
Section titled “Trust Forensics”After a trust violation, determine:
1. What Happened?
Section titled “1. What Happened?”- Which component violated trust?
- What action was taken?
- What damage occurred?
2. How Did It Happen?
Section titled “2. How Did It Happen?”- Was the trust grant appropriate?
- Did verification fail?
- Was there a gap in monitoring?
3. Why Did It Happen?
Section titled “3. Why Did It Happen?”- Component failure (bug, error)?
- Adversarial action (intentional violation)?
- Environmental factor (unexpected input)?
4. What Enabled It?
Section titled “4. What Enabled It?”- Excessive trust grant?
- Insufficient verification?
- Correlated failures?
- Trust concentration?
5. How to Prevent Recurrence?
Section titled “5. How to Prevent Recurrence?”- Architectural changes?
- Additional verification?
- Trust bound reduction?
- Monitoring improvements?